Will one of you guys please post the yum conf for DAG (dag.repo?) along with packages that should be yum'd?
Erik Espinoza wrote: > I too use the DAG/RPMForge rpm's for perl. Makes things a lot easier. > > Erik > > On 1/22/07, Alexey Loukianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Vince Callaway wrote: >> > While in general I would agree with you, but not in this case. Centos >> > works fine with the exception of spamassassin. All the people that >> sent >> > me the lint outputs only one showed all the modules functioning. >> > Spamassassin is one of the key elements needed in the spam battle. >> >> That is not the critical difference to exchange the security and >> stability of RHEL-derivate with the 'bleeding-edge' Fedora testbox. >> Each distro is good for the things it had been produced for. That is why >> all of the servers I handle use RHEL3/4 or CentOS3/4, while my home >> desktop has god Fedora6 installed. To get all the modules of SA working >> on CentOS, the only thing you have to do is to use CPAN to install some >> perl extensions (bad way), or to use DAG's repos to fetch RPM with >> relevant perl modules already compiled and ready for use. Even more, it >> was newer a big challenge to write a RPM SPEC file for any CPAN module >> source and compile module yourself. >> >> > I now have five fedora boxes running qmail-toaster, all are stable and >> > spam free. >> Sorry, but I don't believe you ;-D. Such thing as 'SPAM-FREE' is only >> possible in case current email-protocols will get replaced somehow with >> more security related ones, with a guaranteed sender authentication. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Alexey Loukianov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> System Engineer, >> IT Department, >> Lavtech Corp. >> -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
