Alexey Loukianov wrote:
> Greetings, Erik.
>
> 31 ?????? 2007 ?., 6:02:20 you have wrote:
>>> Separate tcprules file for submission port seems to me as a better
>>> approach. It keeps administration of QT flexible and unified, and also
>>> it is more cross-platforming way, as tcpserver works on any platform
>>> qmail can run on, while iptables is available only on linux systems
>>> based on kernels 2.4.x and later.
>
>> Who cares? We don't even support Debian. . . :)
>
> Me, for example ;-D. A friend of mine, also a system engineer,
> administer small FreeBSD based cluster, and he uses QT in his setup.
> Accordingly to his words, it wasn't too hard to build and install RPM
> system on his BSD boxes, and then to correct specs so basic QT parts
> builds up and install successfully.
>
> Well, in any case we can always create tcp.submission ourselves, just
> like I do it for tcp.pop3 ;-D. But the laziness of sysadmin is the
> thing that makes me want tcp.submission to be included in stock
> toaster.
>
I agree with Alexey on this. Besides which, wouldn't it be nice to have QT
on BSD as well? I wonder if Alexey's friend would care to contribute in this
area.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
