Now you've got me thinking, Bill. (which is sometimes dangerous!) For the stock toaster, you bring up a good point.
What if I were an Enterprise type of user and wanted to run SM on a separate host from the toaster? How difficult would that be? Can the toaster be packaged in such a way as to make this easier, without 'hurting' the stock toaster? IOW, make them loosely (minimally) coupled? Bill Kwok wrote: > Hi Erik, > > It seems that the standard installation of qt installs both squirrelmail > and qmail at the same server. So I assume the whole submission process > happens within the qt server and localhost doesn't need to check against > any RBL. Besides, I suppose users can only send email through > squirrelmail after they have been authenticated (by > squirrelmail). What's the benefit of submitting the mail through the > submission port? > > Best regards, > Bill > > On 2/7/07, *Erik Espinoza* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Nevermind, the config_local.php changes the setting back. > > We haven't changed the SquirrelMail because some people have the > policy of not upgrading all packages, just the ones that need updating > (ClamAV, SpamAssassin, SquirrelMail) but not the djb licensed > packages. > > This is because of security. Next SquirrelMail release I'll change the > port to 587 and require qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.8 or higher. > > Thanks, > Erik > > On 2/6/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hey Slamp, > > > > I was under the impression that Squirrelmail used /usr/sbin/sendmail > > to send mail, not smtp. Doesn't your config.php have "$useSendmail > > = true;" > > > > Erik > > > > The reason squirrelmail uses > > On 2/6/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not > using the > > > submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be > checked > > > against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster > (sending) when > > > configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL > checks. This > > > also prevents the error "Server replied: 354" when an RBL > timeout occurs. > > > > > > BTW I just updated to the latest and greatest including the 3 > devel packages > > > and everything is perfect (knocks on wood). > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org > <http://www.vr.org>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
