I did the upgrades last night.  No difference. :(

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik A. Espinoza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures

Ensure you are using the latest version of the qmail-toaster rpm from
the devel site. It is very likely that at least some of the issues
relating to qmail-dk may be caused by the missing bigdns patch which
is now included.

Erik

On 3/7/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Jason P wrote:
> > Do these permissions look correct for qmail-dk?  I'm just trying to
think of
> > something...
> >
> > -rws--x--x   1 qmailq qmail  49216 Mar  6 12:36 qmail-dk
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric "Shubes" [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:07 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Random Domainkey Failures
> >
> > Jason P wrote:
> >> Randomly, incoming and outgoing mail will fail domainkey checks.  I've
> >> tested this with both yahoo and gmail, and get the same results.  I
> >> cannot understand what is happening or why.  Might there be a package
> >> domainkeys is depending on, that is not behaving correctly?  I've
> >> upgraded everything to the devel versions, double checked DNS records,
> >> and sent out various tests.  Sometimes it works, and other times it
> >> doesn't.  Does anyone have any clues?  I'm running CentOS 4.3 x64.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jason
> >
> > qmail-dk is broken in some cases. That's why we don't use the BG
settings in
> > DKVERIFY. Some keys (gmail in particular) don't verify correctly.
> >
> > I'm not aware of a problem with outgoing signatures though. You might
want
> > to set "t=y" in your _domainkey DNS record until Alexey (or someone)
gets a
> > chance to fix up qmail-dk. FWIW, gmail (google, who's the force behind
DK
> > and DKIM) runs DK with t=y. DKIM will be relacing DomainKeys anyway some
> > time in the future. DKIM was recently approved as a standard, but
there's no
> > toaster (or qmail TTBOMK) implementation of it yet.
> >
>
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to