This looks like a good avenue for a different branch, as we work
towards the future of the QmailToaster.
For the remainder of 1.3 and possibly 1.4, we'll probably be sticking
with the current methods.
On 3/7/07, David Sánchez Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Qmail-SPP have a great community writing plugins, that are more compatible
between them.
See, for example one of the battle-horses of this list, apply RBL
_only_if_not_authenticated_ , is resolved in one of the plugins of Roberto
Alsina's collection (http://ra-plugins.googlecode.com/)
http://ra-plugins.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rblchecks.man.txt
" If the user is successfully authenticated, this plugin disables itself
for the session. This is
necessary because most home IP addresses are listed in one RBL or the
other. This behaviour,
may become configurable in the future."
This will help in, for example, using residential/dynamic IP blocklists
without the worry of blocking your own users.
This is just an example, I'm pretty sure a lot of functionality will be
gained with Qmail-SPP, since not every one knows how to write a patch for
qmail, but plugin's are much more easy (and can be as efficient as patches).
Now, the problem is, who will have the time to work in this? :-)
Just my two cents.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
|
David Sanchez Martin | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Administrador de Sistemas | http://www.e2000.es
E2000 Nuevas Tecnologias |
|
E2000 Organizacion de Empresarios | Tel : +34 902 19 61 77
Mediadores de Seguros |
|
Agustin Bravo Esquina Calle C |
33120 Pravia Asturias Spain |
|
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Buzzz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 07 de marzo de 2007 17:38
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Qmail SPP
> I don't know for sure, but I doubt it.
>
> While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is
> only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities
> that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to
> use that the toaster doesn't already provide?
>
> --
I have no particular feature would like to implement .
I'm researching the optimal configuration to make a spam-gateway with
qmail and I would like
to use the toaster as it's base .
I prefer the approach of spp cause is much more modular than write a patch
everytime i need i new a feature and it appears to be not too far from
the modularity of postfix .
Mine would be only a curiosity regarding qmt's support for spp, nothing
more .
Thx for help :)
Have Fun,
Davide
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
