That's a very good idea Tim.... I'm going to do it too!
George S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Mancour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Eric,
I had to back off to a value of 3 for the same reason. Since I've observed
that Email's that return softfail are often spam I added the following
rule
to my local.cf file:
header spf_softfail Received-SPF =~ /softfail/
score spf_softfail 1.0
Regards,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] SPF rejecting test mode
Eric "Shubes" wrote:
It came to my attention today that my toaster is rejecting messages
based on SPF policy even though the sender's SPF policy indicates that
the domain is
testing:
http://www.openspf.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&ip=63.109.97
.44&receiver=doris
I have /var/qmail/control/spfbehavior set to 4 (reject softfail).
Perhaps I should back off to a value of 3 (the stock setting)?q
Has anyone else noticed this behavior?
Yes, I have seen this as well. I had assumed that a SPF record in testing
causing a "softfail" was the proper behavior, since technically it's not
passing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
