Eric Spaeth wrote:
I looked at a couple example RFC-2821 patches for qmail-remote, and I think I captured the main cases where qmail-remote should be attempting a connection to an alternate MX (if available):Thanks for the patch. I've brought the subject up on the developer's list for at least further testing.1) 400-599 code return on greeting (lame server) 2) 400-599 code after qmail-remote identifies3) 400-599 code for recipients (flagbother not set as part of the else clause)Here's my first stab at a patch: http://www.spaethco.com/share/qmail-rfc2821.patchInitial testing seems to indicate the patch is working as anticipated; I would appreciate review of these changes by the development community for future inclusion in the project.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
