Hmmm, didn't analyze that one... well I'm going to check everything again...
I'll get back to you guys on this one as time permits. 2007/7/2, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi AM, On 7/2/07, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that we may disable incoming checks and just maintain outbound > signing. > As far as I saw there are no outgoiong issues with DK. This way we still get > our > messages signed :) Failure to sign will cause outbound signing to silently fail as well. Not sure this is a good idea. > I've also been checking DKIM and I'm thinking of taking some tests during > this July. > I'll post news on this as I go along. There are no stable/working DKIM patches thus far. Erik > 2007/7/2, Erik A. Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It may stay as an option, not 100% sure yet. The problem is that it is > > broken and can lose mail if enabled, even if the incoming mail is not > > signed. > > > > Erik > > > > On 7/2/07, A M < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > First of all may thanks to Nick for is excellent work and dedication to > QMT. > > > > > > Second congrats to Erik for is appointement ;) > > > > > > As for the way things will go I would like to point out a reuest of > > > maintaining DK. > > > Buggy or not sinning is a major deal so I hope it stays in, even has an > > > option. > > > > > > > > > Cumpliments, > > > > > > A M > > > > > > 2007/6/29, Erik A. Espinoza < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > No. It contains broken DK, which may be coming out. It also doesnt > have > > > SRS. > > > > > > > > Erik > > > > > > > > On 6/29/07, davide bozzelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Erik A. Espinoza ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > > > > The 1.4 branch is in the restructuring phase. Moving configs over > to a > > > > > > config package, and other things. I believe the final 1.4 will be > > > > > > basically the same patches we have now (without Warlord, With > Updated > > > > > > SRS & CHKUSER patches). > > > > > > > > > > > What about the > > > http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined.shtml patches ? > > > > > > > > > > It seems it contains all the qmailtoaster pacthes (except for src > patch) > > > > > and much more . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have fun, > > > > > Davide > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > AM > > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted < http://www.vr.org> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > AM > agmsoft(at)gmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com
