I'm sending this mail to let everyone know that the recompilation was succesfull. I could disable the auth-requirement and now users without authentication are included in the policy. I know it is a risk becouse it is easy to forge the sender email, but that's something i could live with until I reconfigure all clients to use smtp-auth.
Is it okey if I introduce this information on the qmail-wiki? Or is it completely off-topic? Natalio. On Nov 19, 2007 7:25 PM, Natalio Gatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A M: > Thanks! You're right, with authentication enabled everything works fine. I > have to give a shot to the compile option, becouse I have 200 clients > configured without smtp-auth (they are users inside a company). > I'll post the results of the recompilation. > > Natalio. > > > On Nov 19, 2007 12:53 PM, A M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Natalio I've replied in the empf list... dindn't see this one. > > > > check it > > > > As for information: > > > > The policy patch by default enforces auth in every smtp, so only > > authenticated users can send email. > > > > This can be change in the conf file for the policies prior to compile > > but IS NOT recomended has it may invalidate the policy check routine. > > > > AM > > > > > > 2007/11/18, Natalio Gatti < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I'm sending this mail to this list becouse it seems that a couple of > > > qToaster's have implemented the empf patch successfully. > > > Yesterday I test an installation of the empf patch provided by A M. I > > > could patch, build and install the new qmail-toaster rpm correctly. > > > I created a file named policy in /var/qmail/control > > > If the file is empty, everything is OK. I can send & receive mail > > > correctla, and for evry mail I can see a log that says: > > > > > > 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505799500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> > > > local [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) > > > 2007-11-17 05:47:15.505804500 policy_check: policy allows transmission > > > > > > > > > Whenever I put something in that file, all mail is denied. I try the > > > most simple policy (allow-all): > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat /var/qmail/control/policy > > > test.com:LREI, > > > > > > And all mail is rejected with the following log: > > > 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245414500 policy_check: local [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> > > > local [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UNAUTHENTICATED SENDER) > > > 2007-11-18 06:00:35.245688500 policy_check: sender not authenticated > > > > > > A M, or any of the others who have implemented the empf patch: Am I > > > doing something wrong? Is the policy incorrect? > > > > > > Natalio. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > AM > > agmsoft(at)gmail.com > > >
