Just a matter of curiosity, Why 53 seconds?, why not 300 (5 minutes), since every mta I know retries in more than 5 minutes ?
Did you use spamdyke for this? The graylisting in spamdyke, afaik, acts only on e-mail addresses (the From+To addresses), and not IP's, and I'm interested in knowing your experiences with it. --- David Sanchez Martin Administrador de Sistemas [email protected] GPG Key ID: 0x37E7AC1F E2000 Nuevas Tecnologías Tel : +34 902 830500 -----Mensaje original----- De: Jake Vickers [mailto:[email protected]] Enviado el: viernes, 24 de abril de 2009 1:50 Para: [email protected] Asunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Any experiences with greylisting? Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. wrote: > I once installed qmail-greyd. It worked fine if you only wanted to > add greylisting. Here is a quick link I found about it... > http://am3n.profusehost.net/index.php?print=48 > > I had to disable it because I got to many complaints about delayed email. > I run greylisting on some of my mail servers, using a 52 second retry window. Honestly, greylisting only blocks about 1% of the incoming spam - that's across the 4 servers I have running it. 3 years ago it was great. Now spammers try again anyway, if they're still around in an hour or two. For that matter, most of my spam is coming from Gmail these days. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Managed Qmailtoaster servers are now available Visit http://qmailtoaster.com/QMTManaged.html to order yours today! Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
