See response below; Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
> W dniu 05.11.2009 20:02, Eric Shubert pisze:
>>
>> I just came across what I think is a possible hole in spamdyke's
>> configuration.
>>
>> I've been reading through the documentation regarding TLS, and it
>> appears that with no "tls-level" option specified, if a spammer were
>> to use TLS (advertised by qmail), spamdyke would be unable to use
>> several of its filters because the data is encrypted passing through
>> spamdyke to qmail-smtp.
>> [...]
> I don't think so.
> From http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html
> ,,If |tls-level| is not given, spamdyke will use a value of |smtp|.''
>
> --
Elsewhere on the same page:
"First, with no TLS options given, spamdyke will identify a TLS
conversation and simply pass the data back and forth between qmail and the
remote client."
Can you say Ambiguous?
Hey, HOW's about those headers so we can help solve this problem???
Kent Busbee
Director of Technology
Northlake Christian School
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
