Eric Shubert wrote:
Good question. I don't know the answer to that off hand.
Michael Colvin wrote:
Oh, I totally agree, Eric. I guess my point was trying to find out
if there
was any reason they needed to do it that way... Really, the eMPF
functionality should be on his internal server, not the external relay
server... Then, the internal server could relay to the QMT w/o
having eMPF
on it, and the internal server would still limit user e-mails.
Unless of course the users also connect from externally...
Couldn't he also have the internal server relay via port 587 to the
toaster?
Does eMPF look at 587 traffic also?
I'm 99% sure that it does, since it's a patch applied to the smtp daemon
in a global sense.
Also, isn't this a Spamdyke config issue with the IP addres?
11-10 16:07:45 spamdyke[27917]: DENIED_OTHER from: d...@acbsco.com to:
a...@solution-group.com origin_ip: 192.168.105.110 origin_rdns:
It reads to me that it was denied because of "DENIED_OTHER" by spamdyke
for origin_rdns.
It's late, so correct me if I'm wrong.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail: qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com
