On Apr 27, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > Perhaps there's another XML parser that is used if XML::SAX doesn't exist? I > can only speculate. I expect that there are others on the list that know > better than I do about this.
it's the other way around; that error message indicates that XML::SAX is falling back to its built-in pure-Perl parser, and the fix is to install a better one (or to take action that indicates to XML::SAX that yes, you really do want it to use the pure-Perl parser). it's all in the FAQ. -shuff -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v http://five.sentenc.es
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
