Eric,
        Unfortunately there is no firewall running on this box (at the
moment), but the issue is still present.

This is what I am seeing in my /var/log/qmail/pop3/current log

2010-06-08 04:19:55.586965500 tcpserver: status: 1/200
2010-06-08 04:19:55.586967500 tcpserver: pid 8239 from 192.168.10.145
2010-06-08 04:19:55.588988500 tcpserver: ok 8239 :192.168.10.100:110
:192.168.10.145::57505
2010-06-08 04:19:57.407394500 tcpserver: end 8239 status 256
2010-06-08 04:19:57.407396500 tcpserver: status: 0/200

It appears to be doing the right thing, but the user still does not get
authenticated.

Any other ideas?

Cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2010 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: POP3 Authentication issues on CentOS 5.5 64Bit

Sorry, I was thinking smtp, not pop3.

Outlook'07 should do pop3/tls ok, but I haven't used it personally.

If they cannot pop w/out tls, just a plain vanilla connection, I'd guess 
a firewall problem somewhere.

The pop3 log should show when they're successfully hitting the pop3 
daemon. Does this log show anything?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

Mike Canty wrote:
> Eric,
>       I am just using Outlook 2007.
> 
> The funny thing is, I have a live server running CentOS 5.5 (32bit) with
QMT
> and this works fine.  I am testing this other server (CentOS 5.5 - 64Bit)
> and this is the machine I am having issues with.
> 
> The real problem is the users cannot receive any mail from the server as
> they cannot actually "authenticate" against the server as a user. It's a
> port 110 issue.  On all other "32bit" server I have installed the OS, as
> well as the QMT, but this one was installed remotely by someone else so
> there could be something missing.
> 
> Is there a log file or some command line test I can run to see what is
> happening?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2010 10:54 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: POP3 Authentication issues on CentOS 5.5 64Bit
> 
> Mike Canty wrote:
>> To All,
>>
>>                 I am having issues getting CentOS 5.5 (64Bit) with QMT 
>> to authenticate POP3 accounts.
>>
>>  
>>
>> I can authenticate using IMAP and I can get to all web based management 
>> screens (Webmail, Admin-Toaster, etc.).
>>
>>  
>>
>> How can I test to see what is wrong, or where should I be looking?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>  
>>
>> Mike Canty
>>
> 
> Which client software are you using?
> 
> I'm guessing that you're using a client that's trying to use SSL.
> Use TLS instead. And use port 587 instead of 25 if possible.
> 
> SMTPS (SMTP over SSL, on port 465) is deprecated, and the stock toaster 
> does not include this. There is a page on the wiki that describes how to 
> set this up should you really need to (eg you have remote Outlook'03
users).
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
packages.
     
      To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
     For additional commands, e-mail:
[email protected]




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
    Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
      If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
     
      To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


Reply via email to