I'll have to do some research on Spamassassin in that case as I do not
know enough to "look closer into your bayes setup" right now.
I did notice this in the spamd log: @400000004d80080b0cf39ed4 Mar 15
19:44:49.217 [5208] info: spamd: result: Y 3 -
AWL,PYZOR_CHECK,RDNS_NONE,SARE_UN4,T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT
scantime=0.7,size=2124,user=clamav,uid=89,required_score=3.5,rhost=localhost.localdomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=34382,mid=<[email protected]>,autolearn=no
What I am curious about is the last bit (autolearn = no). Is this
something I should be worried about?
As far as the wiki - I'll be more comfortable writing the wiki page on
this when I have a better understanding.
Thanks,
Scott
On 3/15/11 7:42 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
I would look closer into your bayes setup, as none of the spam headers
you posted had a bayes score at all. I would expect to see one of the
bayes rules hit, which leads me to believe there's something in your
sa-learn processing that isn't quite working.
Good idea about the wiki. Any interest in writing it? (While all this
is fresh in your mind) ;)
