You're probably right. But I have yet to get my pea sized brain wrapped around how that program works.
And what it changes when you update it. Most times what I think it should do when I try a rule it does just the opposite. Go figure. So I guess that's why I gave up on trying to figure it out. Guess I just found more to read huh? _____ From: Eric Shubert [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 10:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Re; Just FYi On 05/10/2011 07:42 AM, Joel Eddy wrote: > Eric, > > After removing the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10" in > tcp.smtp my toaster is now working when a mass mailing it sent. I'm just > letting spamdyke control that with max-recipients=50 > > I suspect the CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10" part may have been the culprit. > But not sure. > > But on a side note. While spamdyke it a wonderful tool for qmail it lacks > one option that would really be cool to add if it's possible. That would be > the ability to add certain word phrases to say a file that could be checked > against for more spam tagging. > > However for those that are still seeing the ever ongoing spam what I've used > and seems to help is to add this to your IPTABLES rules. > > This is all one line when you add it to iptables. Leave the "'s in. Just > change your phrase to filter here. And adjust accordingly to fit your > iptables. > > -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 --dport 25 -m string --string "your phrase to filer > here" --from 0 --algo bm -j DROP > > Now I'm by no means the iptables guru, so if there happens to be someone > here that is and this could use some tuning by all means give us your 2 > cents or more, PLEASE. The more SPAM we kill the better off we all are. > > Anyway, that's my 2 cents for today. > > Joel > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Thanks, Joel. I don't know off hand, but I expect that adding an appropriate SpamAssassin rule to the /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file would accomplish the same thing for you. This would be the preferred way to handle such a filter. I expect someone here might be able to whip up an example of such a rule. Anyone? FWIW, spamdyke doesn't actually scan messages, at least at this point. It simply examines certain parts of the header, as well as the connecting server's configuration (eg rDNS), to apply its filters. -- -Eric 'shubes' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1325 / Virus Database: 1500/3626 - Release Date: 05/09/11
