On 05/20/2011 11:54 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 05/19/2011 12:22 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
This is more of an interest than anything - I have a server where I
actually have enough domains and users on it that the ATA/133 spindle
can't keep up with the mail flow.
Has anyone else encountered a situation where they have hit a physical
spindle limitation? Has anyone ever seen a page or collected data to
show how many IO/s a spindle can handle? I have some numbers, but
they're for FCAL, which is not the case for this particular server.
Just curious if anyone else has pushed they system to the edge of
hardware limitations before.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have not. However, I have maxed out the system bus, which happened well before the HDD reached full capacity. South bridge to be specific. I would expect that to be where the bottleneck is. Given that the SB handles all PCI devices, I would expect that optimizing network traffic could open up a little bandwidth for disk i/o. Here is a recent post from Richard Wilson on the Phoenix LUG list that I'm interested to try:

All,

I ran into this some time ago and thought I should share it -- on a server running iptables that's got a heavy network load, these can make a big difference.

Netfilter (iptables is the main interface command) is a stateful firewall so it tracks connections. This means that it allocates a certain amount of real RAM when the system boots to hold the Connection Tracking Table. Resizing this table requires a reboot. Something you NEVER want to see is console messages that say:

ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet

When I ran into these, I had to do some digging, and found out how to resize the conntrack table, as well as how to decrease the time out value for connections (default for Red Hat is 5 days!). Changing the time out value doesn't require a reboot; changing the table size to an appropriate value for your workload does.

Under Red Hat/Fedora/Centos, in /etc/sysctl.conf (takes effect at boot time):

# Set Conntrack time out to 12 hours
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established = 43200
# Set the size of the conntrack table (old and new versions):
net.ipv4.ip_conntrack_max = XXXXXXX
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max = XXXXXXX

Dynamically change the time out value on the running system (note spaces around the = in the sysctl file, but not here!):

sysctl -w net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established=43200

These helped, but what really made the biggest difference was this:
I found that the conntrack table had a LOT of entries for traffic from 127.0.0.1 (!!) Yes, netfilter will track ALL network traffic. If your kernel is 2.6.9 or above, this command should work to tell netfilter to not track localhost traffic:

iptables -t raw -A OUTPUT -o lo -j NOTRACK

After doing this on several mail relay servers we saw the number of entries in the conntrack table drop to about half what they had been. Of course, they don't drop right away -- existing table entries have to time out.

Hopefully this may save some of you some headaches.

Richard Wilson



Thanks Eric. Not the same problem I'm running into, but good information. I was not aware of the RHEL 5 day timeout. Interesting. My scenario is by using a RAMdisk for email scanning, I've reduced the scan time by 1000%. All good, except now the system accepts and scans too many messages and can't flush them to the spindle fast enough. I end up with thousands of messages waiting to be delivered to local account hung in the queue. I downsized the size of the RAMdisk to throttle this (when it fills up it can't accept new messages and tells the remote to try later), but this is not ideal. I'm in remedial now to move to a fast server - was on a P4 3.2G with 2G of RAM and an ATA/133 disk. Moving to something a little more robust, with faster disks :)
Anyway, was curious as to if anyone else had hit similar situations.
What was the scenarios where you over ran the bus?



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
     If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


Reply via email to