On 05/27/2011 12:10 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:
On 05/26/2011 07:55 PM, Jake Vickers wrote:
> On 05/26/2011 05:41 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>> I would like to see QMT get to a single-table configuration for
>> vpopmail/mysql. Is that never going to happen, or perhaps happen
>> with 5.5? It might be best to leave vpopmail at 5.4.x with QMTv2.0,
>> then upgrade to 5.5 with QMTv2.x, and go to single-table domains at
>> that time. Just a thought.
>>
>
> I haven't given it much thought - anyone care to test what the
> performance impact is by going to a single table? Is there any?
> I know we hijacked this thread, so let's spin off a new one.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apologies for the hijack.
I just seem to recall this being discussed a bit, some time ago, and
concluding (perhaps with no consensus) that having all domains in a
single table made more sense.
So I'm still curious as to what you think the benefits are. Segregating
your data into multiple tables was always the way I learned to obtain
performance. The nature of the requests from QMT are probably not those
that would require any performance tuning - the only one I've ever run
into is the default number of connections. So I'm willing to table that
point if there are other mitigating factors.
So what are the advantages/benefits you are thinking will be gained from
a single table?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
