Great! Thanks Martin! I'll take a look at it and see what I need to do.

Eric - do we have any plans to be using supervise and multilog/daemontools log format for dovecot in the future? It sure is nice when all (or at least many) of your components are using the same logging mechanism/format, and storing them in a standardized location.

Not to get too far off track here, but while we are on the topic of dovecot...has anyone had any experience setting up shared/public namespaces in dovecot for global spam/ham folders? I'm trying to figure out the best way to train spamassassin, and the issue at hand is that the mailboxes are actually stored on a separate QMT machine, and my SA boxes simply do the scanning/filtering before passing the mail to the next hop using smtproutes. Just fishing for some ideas.

Thanks everyone.

Casey Price

Smile Global Technical Support
Submit or check trouble tickets http://billing.smileglobal.com
www.smileglobal.com <http://www.smileglobal.com>

Follow us on Twitter <https://twitter.com/#%21/SmileInternet>
Find us on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/smileglobal>

On 3/2/12 2:17 PM, Martin Waschbüsch wrote:
Am 02.03.2012 um 22:12 schrieb Casey Price:

Martin,

I'm just using the dovecot RPM provided with the instructions on the QMT wiki. 
What exactly is necessary to get qmailmrtg to work with dovecot?

Casey Price

This is nowhere near complete, but it gives you a first idea what needs to be 
done.

Please note that the mrtg.conf file (I think for some reason that's contained 
in the .spec in this package), needs to be adapted as well and the c program of 
course. The package here was my first attempt to convert things to dovecot - it 
assumes logs are multilog/daemontools format and located in 
/var/log/qmail/dovecot/
Also, I did not use dovecot for pop3 back then, so that has also not been taken 
care of.

If you give me some more time, I can easily adapt things so it will work with 
dovecot using syslog and in standard dovecot location and perfect the config 
files, etc.

As it is, I'd consider this very much beta.

Martin

Reply via email to