All ISP, EPS check for both but are not required to have both. SPF+DKIM is more than enough.
In case you have require 100% deliverability, you better enroll on Return Path's Email Certification Program or Spamhaus whitelist. Ernesto Vargas-Azofeifa Senior Web Developer & IT Manager Macromedia Certified Cold Fusion & Web Developer LAMP stack expert. ________________________________ From: F. Mendez <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:44 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - need togetthem both Because a lot of mail server this days still use and checks for domainkeys and not only dkim. In fact, even BIG isp checks for both. We need to have and offer 100% all possible checks for domain certification email traffic. Regards. -----Mensaje original----- From: Eric Shubert Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 7:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK - need togetthem both The stock domainkeys (qmail-dk) process has never worked 100%. I expect that we'll be removing that implementation at some point in the future. DKIM will be included in the stock QMT at some point, but I can't say when. I'm not optimistic that a working DK will ever be included. Why would anyone want DK if they have a working DKIM implementation? -- -Eric 'shubes' On 06/15/2012 05:23 PM, F. Mendez wrote: > Hello Ernesto, > > did you EVER had DomainKeys working? I mean, did you test it before > installing changes for DKIM? > > Because if you had it working before installing DKIM, this means that the > file change on DKIM setup is the one that is not signing. > > > Hopefully some of the "creators" of QMT may arise and help us. > > > > Regards. > > -----Mensaje original----- From: Ernesto Vargas > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: F. Mendez > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] DomainKeys signout FAILED - DKIM signout OK > - need to getthem both > > SPF its just DNS entries nothing to do with QmailToaster. > > Yes I am on the same situation where DomainKeys are not been sign but > DKIM are, but SPF+DKIM is more than enough for me agains Google, Hotmail > and Yahoo. > > Saludos, > > Ernesto Vargas > > On 06/15/2012 01:21 AM, F. Mendez wrote: >> Hello ppl. >> >> >> I am getting my self more and more into QMT and learning it every day. >> Cool solution. >> >> Today I were trying to get DomainKeys and DKIM both sign out. I need >> this, the reason, don't matter. >> >> I got first DomainKeys setup following the WIKI QMT pages. But I didn't >> test it. >> >> Then I went with DKIM and also followed what WIKI info showed. >> >> After sending a simple mail, I got DKIM signout working but no signout >> of DomainKeys. >> >> Yes I have done ALL steps for each, no error aparently showed. >> >> What Im suspecting is that when I got dkim installed, the tutorial also >> showed that a BIN file had to be replaced. >> >> Would that BIN version have DKIM only support and no DomainKeys? >> >> >> Also SPF is not working too. >> >> >> I need help here friends. >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
