> On 08/20/2012 07:05 PM, Kelly Cobean wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2012 06:29 PM, Kelly Cobean wrote:
>>>> Just out of curiosity, I did pretty much a
>>>> textbook QT/QTP install...any idea how/why this text was missing from
>>>> the
>>>> tcp.smtp file?  I had not edited this file prior to today.
>>>
>>> I've no idea. I'll be doing a scratch install in a few days though, and
>>> try to keep my eye on it.
>>>
>>> Here's what I have as /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp in the present pkg (2
>>> lines):
>>> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1"
>>> :allow,BADMIMETYPE="",BADLOADERTYPE="M",CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT="50",CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT="10",QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/simscan",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",NOP0FCHECK="1"
>>>
>>> TTBOMK, this file is coded as "noreplace", which means that an
>>> install/upgrade will never change it if one exists. If there existed
>>> one
>>> from a previous install of some kind, that would persist. Out of
>>> curiosity, what does:
>>> # ls -ltr /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp*
>>> show on the host?
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> root@www ~]# ls -ltr /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp*
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  293 Aug 20 16:50 /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.new
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  251 Aug 20 17:01 /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2325 Aug 20 17:02 /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp.cdb
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I think that tcp.smtp.new would be the original stock version from the
> qmail-toaster package.
>
> I wonder if maybe one of the subsequent packages (simscan perhaps) has a
> tcp.smtp file that needs to be updated. Could be that's where it came
> from. Simscan hadn't been updated in a while before the recent one. rpm
> shows qmail-toaster as owning file file though. Hmmmm. Seems to me that
> qmail-toaster should be dependent upon simscan, but that's not how
> things are presently set up. I need to look into this in a bit more
> detail.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, Kelly.
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>

Glad to help.  Thanks for all your hard work putting this all together.  I
used a qmailrocks installation (on an FC4 box!) for almost 5 years prior
to changing over to QTP last month and let me tell ya the QMR install was
ROUGH!  QT/QTP is worlds better, especially with all the script
automation.  These little speed bumps are nothing.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to