Friday, November 30, 2012, 10:50:33 AM, Eric Shubert wrote:

ES> On 11/06/2012 01:31 PM, Diana Calder wrote:
>> I'm trying to run qtp-newmodel on CentOS 4.9 (originally set up a few
>> years ago from a QMail Toaster ISO). Unfortunately, it's not working.

ES> For starters, please check the date/time on your computer. It appears to
ES> be about 3 weeks slow. ;)

No, actually the date/time issue is because the first time that I sent
this, it was rejected by the list due to a reverse DNS issue that
we've been having. Very weird - the records all looked fine and even
passed *some* of the online mx record checking tools but failed
others. After running a batch of yum updates (including some
BIND-related ones) on our CentOS 6 external DNS server, the reverse
DNS magically started working. At which point, I resent this message
and it finally went through.

When I rebuild our new QMail Toaster, it's definitely getting
PowerDNS, not BIND. And I'm seriously considering switching our actual
DNS servers over to PowerDNS as well - I've seen too many weird and
inexplicable BIND issues magically appear on previously
perfectly-working boxes (and, sometimes, just as magically disappear
again) to be completely satisfied with continuing to use it.

ES> Please update your qmailtoaster-plus.repo package. I think that's where
ES> your problem lies.
ES> http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/wiki/WikiStart#a1-InstallQTPRepository

ES> After that, you should also do
ES> # yum update qmailtoaster-plus
ES> to be sure that's up to date.

Done. However, now I'm getting this when I run qtp-newmodel:

Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3.18 starting Tue Dec  4 10:07:21 EST 2012
qtp-whatami v0.3.8 Tue Dec  4 10:07:21 EST 2012
REAL_DIST=CentOS
DISTRO=CentOS
OSVER=4.9
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.9-103.ELsmp
BUILD_DIST=cnt40
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

Let's get on with it!

The following packages have already been selected:
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6.src.rpm
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.9.src.rpm
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.src.rpm
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10.src.rpm
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.10.src.rpm
autorespond-toaster-2.0.5-1.4.0.src.rpm
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.4.0.src.rpm
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.0.src.rpm
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.7.src.rpm
spamassassin-toaster-3.3.2-1.4.3.src.rpm
simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.4.0.src.rpm
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.7-1.4.1.src.rpm

Do you want to process this selection?
Shall we continue? (yes, no|skip, batch, quit) [y] / n|s / b / q : y

Getting source packages ...(this may take a while)
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.9.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.10.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.10.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
autorespond-toaster-2.0.5-1.4.0.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.4.0.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.0.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.7.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
spamassassin-toaster-3.3.2-1.4.3.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.4.0.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
vqadmin-toaster-2.3.7-1.4.1.src.rpm is already downloaded, bypassed
qtp-dependencies v0.3.2
qtp-install-rpmforge v0.4.0 - getting latest version of rpmforge-release ...
qtp-install-rpmforge - https://raw.github.com/repoforge/rpms/master/specs/rpmfor
ge-release/rpmforge-release.spec not found, please try again later.

qtp-dependencies - installing  compat-gcc-34 compat-gcc-34-c++ compat-glibc comp
at-glibc-headers compat-libf2c compat-libgcc compat-libstdc++-296 compat-libsdc+
+-33 libtool-ltdl libtool-ltdl-devel php-ldap ...
Loading "priorities" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
274 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Parsing package install arguments
No Match for argument: compat-gcc-34
No Match for argument: compat-gcc-34-c++
No Match for argument: compat-libf2c
No Match for argument: compat-libgcc
No Match for argument: compat-libsdc++-33
No Match for argument: libtool-ltdl
No Match for argument: libtool-ltdl-devel
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package php-ldap.i386 0:4.3.9-3.36 set to be updated
---> Package compat-glibc-headers.i386 1:2.3.2-95.30 set to be updated
---> Package compat-libstdc++-296.i386 0:2.96-132.7.2 set to be updated
---> Package compat-glibc.i386 1:2.3.2-95.30 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: php = 4.3.9-3.36 for package: php-ldap
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: php = 4.3.9-3.36 is needed by package php-ldap
qtp-dependencies - installation of base dependencies failed, exiting
qtp-newmodel - dependent packages processing failed, exiting

 --- Hit ENTER to return to menu ---

When I do a "yum list php" I get:

Loading "priorities" plugin
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
274 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
php.i386                                 4.3.11-2.8             installed
Available Packages
php.i386                                 4.3.9-3.36             update

So, in other words, I would need to downgrade php, right? Urgh. That
won't be fun.

Maybe I'll just have to leave this Qmail server as-is and cross my
fingers that being on different versions won't cause any issues when I
migrate over to the new Qmail server...

Speaking of which - where does the CentOS6 & Qmailtoaster situation
stand? Is official support for Qmailtoaster on CentOS6 close or still
some months off? I'd rather use CentOS6 instead of CentOS5 but the new
hardware is here and I need to get it set up, so if CentOS6 support is
still more than a week or two away, I'll have to go with 5.

-- 
Best regards,
 Diana                            mailto:[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to