Il 28/04/2014 18:12, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
On 04/27/2014 01:38 PM, Hasan Akgöz wrote:
Hi Eric,
The first time I heard you specify the subject. I think this method is
not a good idea. becuse If you mess around with MX records, you deserve
to have lost mails and angry co-workers/customer etc... :).
Are you suggesting that there are legit servers that can't handle such
a configuration?
Before I quitted my email service (I migrated to a collegue wich manages
a lot more accounts than me), I was considering to use this way to
capture spam on my servers.
Only problem I see this high priority MX may be active only if another
low level MX is active, otherwise it will classify everything as SPAM,
and a simple reboot of main MX may be troublesome.
So, the main problem is to keep this spam MX up only when lower priority
MX are up.
Tonino
Try ASSP ( Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy Server ).
I've looked at ASSP in the past. I don't see a point in having both
ASSP and spamdyke. If someone can sell me on ASSP over spamdyke, I'd
be happy to look at it again.
Is anyone out there using ASSP with QMT?
And DNSBL,SURBL,SBL,RBL (zen.spamhaus.org
<http://zen.spamhaus.org> and spamcop.org <http://spamcop.org>).
I presently use:
dns-blacklist-entry=b.barracudacentral.org
dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org
I dropped spamcop due to problems they've had with FPs.
Thanks Hasan.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
