On 9/11/2014 2:12 PM, Eric Broch wrote:
> On 9/11/2014 12:29 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>> While researching my latest increase in spam (hidden text in html
>> problem, see Special-case spam filter thread recently), I got some
>> help from John Hardin on the spamassassin list. He did some testing of
>> the samples, and informed me that the latest spamassassin-3.4.0 fired
>> the associated rule properly. Our 3.3.2 version had not.
>>
>> Although I hesitate to install any .0 version of anything, the 3.4.0
>> version of SA underwent significant testing before its release 7
>> months ago, which is evident in that there's been no 3.4.1 version
>> release since then (which I would normally have expected).
>>
>> So I think it's safe to give 3.4.0 a go with QMT and have build the
>> rpms for it. They're available in the yum qmailtoaster-testing repo.
>> While I haven't had a chance to install this yet in any of my QMT
>> hosts, everyone's welcome to give it a go if you'd like. Just don't
>> install it in a critical production host. Wait for it to be /current/
>> before doing that.
>>
>> Note, I don't expect to make this version available as a legacy
>> (spamassassin-toaster) package. If someone can make a good case for
>> doing so though (like creating the updated srpm), I wouldn't be
>> against putting it in the repos. I simply don't have the time to do it
>> now, and my time is better spent elsewhere on the project (like
>> getting the next qmail release done).
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> Hey EricS,
>
> Is this 3.4.0 version a stock out-of-the-box version that one might
> obtain from the CentOS repository?
>
> Eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
Sorry,

Just checked. CentOS is still on 3.3.2.

Eric

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to