On 5/22/2015 7:15 AM, Gary Bowling wrote: > On 5/22/2015 9:01 AM, Gary Bowling wrote: >> On 5/22/2015 8:53 AM, Eric Broch wrote: >>> On 5/22/2015 6:16 AM, Gary Bowling wrote: >>>> Are the toaster packages referenced with qtp-newmodel still being >>>> updated? I run this every month to update my toaster, but haven't >>>> seen any updates in a long time. Not even a spam update. >>>> >>>> Thanks, gary >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> Gary, >>> >>> [Q]tp-newmodel is for CentOS 5 and is no longer being supported as >>> far as I know. I am creating rpms for QTP from the latest source >>> (tar.gz) available for CentOS 5 (x86 and x86_64) and they are on my >>> ftp site, here <ftp://ftp.whitehorsetc.com/pub/qmail/CentOS5/qmt/rpms/>. >>> >>> Eric Broch >> >> Thanks Eric, yea I'm still running CentOS 5. I know, it's out of >> date, but with security updates it's still a fine platform for my >> mail server! I'll check out your ftp site. Are these in a yum repo >> some where? Or added to EPEL? >> >> Gary >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [email protected] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > Ok, looking at your ftp site, I see I'm way behind! I'm running > clamav-toaster-0.98.4-1.4.8 and spamassassin-toaster-3.3.2-1.4.3. So > there are several updates between mine and the latest. > > Is it ok to rpm -Uvh the latest clamav and spamassassin or should I do > each do each update in between mine and the latest? > > Also I don't use dovecot, never had a reason to change as things have > always worked well. Is that going to cause any problems with these > updates? > > Thanks, Gary > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] Gary,
I have the latest rpms on my business server but haven't yet installed them on my client's business server, I haven't had, or made, the time. They seem to be working fine, though on mine. If Courier is working fine for you, You shouldn't have to change to Dovecot with the new updates, the only reason I went to Dovecot is that my client needed a shared email folder, for which Courier, to my knowledge, had no option. That said, Dovecot is actively supported and has many options. Also, Dovecot is now the standard for QTP. The upgrade is fairly easy. It was seemless for me. Eric
