On my qmail centos 5 
Still good and running an older version 

ClamAV update process started at Fri Jan 26 10:29:30 2018
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED!
WARNING: Local version: 0.97 Recommended version: 0.99.3
DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq
main.cld is up to date (version: 58, sigs: 4566249, f-level: 60, builder: 
sigmgr)
daily.cld is up to date (version: 24257, sigs: 1835982, f-level: 63, builder: 
neo)
bytecode.cld is up to date (version: 319, sigs: 75, f-level: 63, builder: neo)
[LibClamAV] ***********************************************************
[LibClamAV] ***  This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated.     ***
[LibClamAV] *** DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq ***
[LibClamAV] ***********************************************************
[LibClamAV] ***********************************************************
[LibClamAV] ***  This version of the ClamAV engine is outdated.     ***
[LibClamAV] *** DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq ***
[LibClamAV] ***********************************************************
Qmail  ~ vmw >current2

But no issues there either. 



> On Jan 26, 2018, at 6:16 PM, Jeff Koch <jeffk...@intersessions.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi - I don't think this has anything to do with the problem - the ClamAV team 
> at Cisco released a buggy set of definitions last night and they need patch 
> that before ClamAV works properly again. Plus they need to fix the clamav 
> code so that a buggy set of definitions will fall back to something that 
> won't kill a mailserver. 
> 
> http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-January/005687.html 
> <http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-January/005687.html>
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On 1/26/2018 11:38 AM, Remo Mattei wrote:
>> Here is what is mine set to
>> 
>> -rws--x--x  1 clamav root   34774 Apr  6  2016 simscan
>> 
>> And increased the exec /usr/bin/softlimit -m 64000000 \
>> 
>> All good here. 
>> 
>> Remo 
>> 
>>> On Jan 26, 2018, at 11:55 AM, Havrla <hav...@lhotkanet.cz 
>>> <mailto:hav...@lhotkanet.cz>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can't create temporary file 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to