If clamav is really disabled and not scanning messages you could safely
stop its daemon to free memory and cpu so delivering should run faster. 

Em 2020-08-07 16:40, Diego Piñon Conde escreveu:

> Hi Philip 
> 
> Yes, mail does get delivered with a very very long delay. I'm still receiving 
> many copies of mails from yesterday at 3pm local time (more than 10 copies in 
> some cases). 
> 
> Looking in the log, apparently clamav is running self check every 600 sec, 
> reading   /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf and not much more. 
> 
> qmHandle -s shows 
> Messages in local queue: 3455
> Messages in remote queue: 0 
> 
> pretty the same that qmqtool -s 
> Messages in local queue: 3452
> Messages in remote queue: 2
> Messages in todo queue: 0 
> 
> The amount of messages in the local queue is still descending but I don't 
> know why so slow! 
> 
> El vie., 7 ago. 2020 a las 15:48, Philip Nix Guru (<[email protected]>) escribió: 
> 
> Hello 
> 
> But the mail does get delivered just with a very long delay ? 
> 
> and you disabled clamd but it still running ? 
> 
> Check a delivered mail, look at the headers, make sure clamd is really not 
> running 
> 
> anything suspicous in /var/log/clamd/clamd.log ? 
> 
> qmHandle -s shows what ? 
> 
> On 8/7/20 8:34 PM, Diego Piñon Conde wrote: 
> 2 hs has passed and the local queue has 3530 msg (it was 3700 at some point). 
> Beside clamd that it is still running and time to time take 100% cpu usage (I 
> don't understand why because qmailtoaster it's supoust that not use it 
> anymore), cpu usage is normally below 20% and memory is the same. So why does 
> it take so long to deliver local msg!
> 
> I'm in UTC -3, so probably all of you are snoring. I will keep working til 
> qmailtoaster works normally, I hope when you wake up you can give me a hand.
> 
> I will really appreciate that. Thanks in advance! 
> 
> El vie., 7 ago. 2020 a las 12:29, Philip Nix Guru (<[email protected]>) escribió: 
> 
> Hello 
> 
> what you could start by doing is disabling 
> 
> idle-timeout-secs=xx in /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf 
> 
> just comment the line
> 
> check in a few hours if your TIMEOUT drastically decreased 
> 
> then you can adapt the idle-timeout delay
> 
> If not then, we can check other things 
> 
> Cheers 
> 
> On 8/7/20 4:40 PM, Diego Piñon Conde wrote: 
> 
> Hi Philip 
> this is  the tail of /var/log/maillog 
> 
> Aug  7 11:31:01 pegasus spamdyke[2968]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 209.85.215.175 origin_rdns: mail-pg1-f175.google.com [1] auth: (unknown) 
> encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:03 pegasus spamdyke[2970]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 209.167.231.144 origin_rdns: mail01.messages.sonicwall.com [2] auth: 
> (unknown) encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:03 pegasus spamdyke[2969]: TIMEOUT from: 
> v-cjcdika_pmnlhikcme_gmicmlkp_gmicmlk...@bounce.info.bancopatagonia.com.ar 
> to: [email protected] origin_ip: 192.156.219.80 origin_rdns: 
> mail7756.info.bancopatagonia.com.ar [3] auth: (unknown) encryption: TLS 
> reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:06 pegasus spamdyke[2974]: TIMEOUT from: 
> bounce-10710_html-121882056-2177875-6399888-...@bounce.mail.bbva.com.ar to: 
> [email protected] origin_ip: 13.111.6.12 origin_rdns: 
> mta.mail.bbva.com.ar [4] auth: (unknown) encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:24 pegasus vpopmail[3225]: vchkpw-submission: (PLAIN) login 
> success [email protected]:10.10.10.8
> Aug  7 11:31:27 pegasus spamdyke[3004]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 91.211.241.9 origin_rdns: pmta41009.emsmtp.com [5] auth: (unknown) 
> encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:32 pegasus spamdyke[3006]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 40.107.76.91 origin_rdns: mail-eopbgr760091.outbound.protection.outlook.com 
> [6] auth: (unknown) encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:34 pegasus spamdyke[3050]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 190.210.19.10 origin_rdns: webmail.provinciaseguros.com [7] auth: (unknown) 
> encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:38 pegasus spamdyke[3074]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 209.85.210.45 origin_rdns: mail-ot1-f45.google.com [8] auth: (unknown) 
> encryption: TLS reason: TIMEOUT
> Aug  7 11:31:42 pegasus spamdyke[3158]: TIMEOUT from: 
> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> 200.41.224.100 origin_rdns: mail.mardelplata.gov.ar [9] auth: (unknown) 
> encryption: (none) reason: TIMEOUT 
> 
> I've checked scan.conf and logverbose = yes 
> 
> El vie., 7 ago. 2020 a las 11:27, Philip Nix Guru (<[email protected]>) escribió: 
> 
> Hello 
> 
> can you check if you got any 
> 
> TIMEOUT in /var/log/maillog log file 
> 
> since you did your update 
> 
> Check also your scan.conf file 
> 
> /etc/clamd.d/scan.conf 
> 
> Enable Log (verbose) , 
> 
> LogVerbose yes 
> 
> On 8/7/20 4:12 PM, Diego Piñon Conde wrote: 
> Hi all
> 
> I'm running qmail toaster on CentOS 7.
> 
> Because I had problems with freshclam (terrible slow db update), yesterday I 
> changed clamAV to Epel version.
> 
> I don't know if it's relevant, but after that local delivery was too slow.
> 
> Local queue was increasing in size and every email received by clients was 
> received 5 or 6 times.
> 
> I thinked maybe clamd it's the culprit, so I've changed clamd=no in 
> simcontrol and did qmailctl cdb but nothing has changed.
> 
> My knowledge is limited and  I will appreciate any help
 

Links:
------
[1] http://mail-pg1-f175.google.com
[2] http://mail01.messages.sonicwall.com
[3] http://mail7756.info.bancopatagonia.com.ar
[4] http://mta.mail.bbva.com.ar
[5] http://pmta41009.emsmtp.com
[6] http://mail-eopbgr760091.outbound.protection.outlook.com
[7] http://webmail.provinciaseguros.com
[8] http://mail-ot1-f45.google.com
[9] http://mail.mardelplata.gov.ar

Reply via email to