Oliver Vogel schrieb:
if you use xxx.clone(); to get a copy of a object, the object itself is
cloned, but not the userdata, added by xxx.addData(...)
i think, we first have to discuss, if this is what we want, or not and
then add this to the todo for the next release (or not ;-)
i - for myself - think, it is a good idear to clone this data with the
clone - function, because if i want to clone a object i would like to
get all of the object and not only the stub without the personal data
what do you - ALL OF THE LIST - think?
yes it is a good idea IMHO - not for the next release (by me) but
sometimes we should do this.
Sebastian
Olli
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
