We're taking a different approach for our initial implementation attempts.
We're expecting that Qooxdoo's hash codes will be unique for all created
widgets in a given application instance. Thus, given the way we create
client-side objects, we'll simply have a dictionary mapping server-side
object IDs to client-side hash codes. We're hoping this will be a bit
more of a light-weight solution than the addData() option we've been using.
Best regards,
Chris
Simon Bull wrote:
In case someone is following this up, I've since learned that QxObject allows
you to addData() to instances and QxExtend allows you to addProperty() to
classes.
See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13949686 and
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.javascript.qooxdoo.devel/669 .
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
--
Chris Ricks - BE (Melb)
Lead Software Engineer
IT Operations
Phone: 1300 722 388
Mobile: 0433 276 911
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Ricks
n:Ricks;Chris
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:1300 722 388
tel;cell:0433 276 911
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
