[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> I just tested moving the instanceId to the URL, and it works fine, so I >> don't have a problem with that. To support this model, the makeServerURL >> function discussed above would get an additional optional parameter for the >> instance id. This looks like a good solution to me, and I can contribute the >> necessary code (both on the client and the Java side). However, I'd rather >> not hide this id inside a generic server_data attribute (which is nice idea >> on its own). > > Ok, that's fine. Just please don't add it to the call interface. Implement > it as a property or something so that it's only accessed by applications that > care about it.
Minor brain fart there. If it's part of the URL, then there's nothing extra to add to the call interface. Cheers, Derrell _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
