Hi Jose, I want to try to help you to understand the material a bit better. Maybe it's possible for you to enhance the documentation afterwards to make it even clearer for new qooxdoo users.
The build is better than the source. Especially for the final release of the product. The reason is maybe more the latency than the real network speed. To handle 200 single requests is much slower than one with a larger file. The "compiled" files also have no optional white spaces and comments. They only contains the functional parts of the class files. This makes them smaller. The performance difference is definitely noticeable. It's not the execution speed which slows down using the "source". It's the loading time as explained above. The loading time is about 3-4x higher (depending on your connection) than using the built version. If you use one of the skeletons you need not to check which classes are you using. This is done automatically for you then. Loading classes afterwards is maybe a good idea to reduce the initial load time. But it's not a good idea to load each class separately. Better is to build packages from the available classes e.g. a core package, a tree & listview package, a toolbar & menu package, ... Hope this clears the things a bit. Cheers, Sebastian Jose Leon schrieb: > Hello, > On 9/7/06, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The problem I have is that I don't want to include a 900Kb .js file on >>> a page that has a single button, so I don't want to use the build >>> system, and the alternative seems to be to include the separate source >>> files, but in the manual says using the built library improves >>> performance and that's what I'm worried about. >> If there are manuals no one seems to read them ;) >> >> Please take a look here: >> http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/user_manual/custom_builds > I have already read that documentation, in fact I have read the whole > manual, and I told that I read all that pages on the first message on > this thread, what I'm asking is this: > > -In the manual you say that using the prebuilt system it's better > because a higher performance of the components. My question is if this > performance it's noticeable by the end user or not. > > -And the other question is that you say, to reduce the size of the > qx.js, you must first check which components are you using on your > application and then build a custom build, and that it's exactly what > I'm trying not to do, what I want it's to load dynamically all the > sources required and in your manual you say that this was the method > used before the build system was included. So the question is if there > is a common rule or a standard method to know which .js source files > to include to use a component. For example: > > To use a Button: > -include A.js > -Include B.js > -Include C.js > > I hope this time it's clearer. > > Also I would like to know if it's not possible to create a dynamic > system to load the required sources depending on the class you are > using, for example: > > -Create a common array in the form of: > > Button=>"a.js","b.js","c.js" > TextField=>"a.js","b.js","c.js" > > That way you can write a simple function which includes all the > required source files if you are using a class. > > Regards ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
