Fabian Jakobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > shouldn't we put the encode64 function somewhere else so it can be used > outside of XmlHttpTransport? I would suggest to put it into > qx.lang.String.encode64.
Sebastian, this seems like a good suggestion. Is String the best place to put it, or is there some place more appropriate? Can you think of any reason not to make it a public function? (It won't be used all that often, though, other than for Transport. How do we make it public someplace like in the String class while still allowing your recent build optimizations to eliminate it if it's not used?) Derrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
