Generally I would suggest to define a modier which nullifies your setter e.g. this.setFoo = null;
Cheers, Sebastian Simon Bull schrieb: > Hi All, > > Does anyone know if there a nice way of defining an immutable property? > > I want to set a class member once only (in the constructor) with the > benefit of qx.OO.addProperty()'s type, possibleValues and allowsNull > checks. > > But I don't want a setter method to be able to modify the value later - > and so I don't need any of qx.OO.addProperty() generated event handling. > > Is there an efficient way to do this? > > Thanks, > > Simon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > On Yahoo!7 > Answers: 25 million answers and counting. Learn something new today > <http://au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tag/answers/SIG=11bmpos4j/**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo7.com.au%2Fanswers> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
