Just a though, if I migrate now with 7.0 PRE , is the code will tay
compatible with the 0.7 release ?
Thanks in advance
PS: I'm using this syntax with tabs,
if (blabla) {
}
so i the migration tool works that way, it's ok for me :)
Derrell.Lipman wrote:
>
> In testing the migration from 0.6.5 to 0.7(pre), I had two failures, and
> some
> problems for which I provide suggestions/requests...
>
> Failures (both previously reported):
>
> 1. An abstract class that has a singleton pattern for testing was
> previously
> able to be used as an abstract class, but the migration converts it to
> a
> singleton which can not be extended as an abstract class.
>
> 2. A class defined with no superclass is properly migrated, but at runtime
> the
> new Clazz structure is overwritten because of incorrect copying of the
> qx.OO class definition from input to output.
>
>
> Generally, the migration went well. I did find, though, that it
> restructured
> the code *style* which I found quite annoying. I don't think that there
> is
> any reason that if I nicely structure an array or object, or put my braces
> at
> the beginning of the "next" line, that the migration should move things
> around
> and "unstructure" or "restructure" it. Braces movement seems most
> prevalent
> with the construct method, but I saw it elsewhere as well -- particularly
> with
> my nicely indented structured arrays and objects. The style generated by
> the
> migration is, like in traditional qooxdoo source, mixed, not consistent.
>
> It took me a couple of hours to fix up the code style again, and that was
> on
> only a few of days worth of development. I expect that those with large
> projects needing migration will find themselves with quite a bit of manual
> labor ahead of them if they care about maintaining a consistent code
> style, or
> one that doesn't exactly match what the migration is creating.
>
> Since the migration appears to be "rewriting" much of the code, I suggest
> that
> there be a flag (or set of flags, similar to what the "indent" program
> provides) to allow the migration to maintain a consistent style agreeable
> to
> the developer. If nothing else, then a "braces at end of line" vs "braces
> at
> beginning of next line" option would be quite helpful, and arrays and
> objects
> should not be restructured.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Derrell
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Experience-with-migration-to-0.7-tf3255161.html#a9068994
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
