Andreas Ecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just did a grep through treevirtual and got 16 matches for the > qx.ui.table namespace. > > I would also suggest to reconsider moving those parts out of the table > namespace that are of some general interest to other widgets/parts of > the system. Maybe something appears to be quite table-specific at first, > but could be of more general use? > > Of course, you certainly have a much better idea of all the table stuff, > so do what is best for further development of the table,
TreeVirtual is a subclass of Table, so of course there are numerous accesses to the qx.ui.table namespace. :-) Although there were a few little things in Table that I thought could be of general use as I was working on TreeVirtual, there's very little that I think should be separated. (At the moment, I can't think of anything.) I made some changes to Table to allow it to be more easily used by subclasses, e.g. allowing some of the helper classes to be more easily replaced by subclasses, but Til generally did a fabulous job of making it flexible for uses other than a standard table. I don't think there's anything that needs to be moved out of the Table namespace right now; only the hierarchy reorganization is really needed. Cheers, Derrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
