I also think so.
Hugh Gibson wrote: > >> Yes, this is normal. >> >> Static members are not inherited. You need to use a additional >> ".superclass" then. > > Was this a conscious design decision? It seems to me to go against the OO > grain to have to work out which superclass defines the static that you > want. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/this.self%28arguments%29-tf3901756.html#a11073911 Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
