Thanks, I was unable to see this typo.
Qooxdoo would need to have Google technology: "Did you meant blah blah
blah...." :-D
Alex Back-2 wrote:
>
> I think you just have a typo in your code. The constructor has the
> "construct"
> key.
>
> So if you write
>
> construct: function() {
> arguments.callee.base.apply(this, arguments);
> },
>
> everything should work well.
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Invalid-type-of-key-%22constructor%22-tf3913786.html#a11096927
Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
