Yes, qooxdoo is, like other fat js libs, more for internal apps, or "real" Desktop-like Webapps (typical office applications like mail, note, calendar and so on), but not a real perfect choose for normal websites.
This isn't a bad think, only different, and the market for that seems not as big as the website market at the moment. But I'm absolutly sure that when most desktop developers must switch to webapps, they will prefer a solution like qooxdoo. So the main target shouldn't been normal "ajax XYZ" articles, but articles in typical developer magazines around the world. --> Whats about to start a wiki page where we all write together an article about qooxdoo which can be sended to different mags to publish? Siarhei Barysiuk schrieb: > Hello, > > At first I would like to say that personally for me qooxdoo is better > than for example > Dojo and GWT because it has really clean structure and it's very very > good designed. > And I'm very wondered when qooxdoo is not noticed in some articles, > reviews and news > along with other libraries. > > I think that a main cause of it that qooxdoo is rated as framework for > internal Intranet > applications which hard to extend with custom html and other things. Of > course qooxdoo > has comprehensive theme support but it doesn't have included themes like > ordinary web site. > May be if qooxdoo have something like theme-builder which allows to > create own theme > simply and quickly it would be a big plus for qooxdoo. > > I want to say thanks for all qooxdoo developers. Guys, you are doing > great things! And we > very appreciate your work. None of surveys or popularity estimations > can't say how easy to use > this library. > > All the best, > Siarhei Barysiuk > > dperez wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> A rough estimation of popularity is to consider the number of hits in a >> Google search. >> >> Here are the results for the 3 frameworks I considered when choosing >> Qooxdoo: >> >> - qooxdoo: 405.000 hits >> - Dojo: 1.240.000 hits >> - OpenLazslo: 1.730.000 >> - Google GWT: 1.390.000 >> >> Nearly nobody knew qooxdoo a year ago. Now I think it is getting more >> popular. >> >> >> Tobias Koller (GERMO GmbH) wrote: >> >> >>> I was discussing with a colleague of mine about qooxdoo and its >>> popularity ( I told him how great it is ;) ). >>> >>> Do you have any idea/information about how many users using qooxdoo? >>> >>> >>> >>> Whenever I read something about ajax, js-frameworks, etc they always >>> >>> write about dojo, ... >>> >>> >>> At least the latest issue of the german "Entwickler-Magazin" includes >>> qooxdoo 0.6.6 on it's >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > qooxdoo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
