On 9/6/07, Derrell Lipman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian, it appears that all you've done here is revert to the > original behavior including your original patch. You've removed my > changes that alllow a drop onto self when self really supports it. > The problem with returning 'true' unconditionally in supportsDrop() is > that it allows, for example, dragging of a list item to show a "drop > ok" icon when it hovers over itself. supportsDrop() must only return > true when it is really ok to drop there. It can't be unconditional.
Just to clarify a bit more... It's not the supportsDrop() that's the problem now; it's the fact that the drop target is wrong. Someone needs to figure out why, when you hover over a treevirtual, it sometimes tells you that you're hovering over a horizontal box layout instead. Derrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
