Derrell Lipman schrieb:
>
> I believe that these bugs should be fixed before it gets applied to 
> the 0.7 branch.  The 0.7 branch is not a "development" branch per se, 
> so it should, I think, always be in a fully "working" state.  It is 
> the current "release" and should, I think, act as such.  That does, 
> however, leave a gap... How does one do development on the current 
> release?  Or does one?  Maybe all new features should be added only to 
> 0.8 and only bug fixes belong in 0.7?  (I expect a lot of resistance 
> to that proposal. :-)

Of course, I am not impartial, but here my argument: the patch doesn't 
break any existing behaviour, and any developer is free to use the new 
classes or not to use them - they won't be included into your build or 
source version if you do not need them. So I don't see a reason why it 
cannot be applied. We can put a big warning note into the 
qx.ui.table.celleditor.ComboBox that it is not fully functional yet, but 
apart from this, it works pretty well.

Thanks, Christian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to