ListView perfomance decreases a lot when the number of items increases. This doesn't happen with the table. I use the table for everything, and I even don't include the ListView in my builds.
Leander Hanwald wrote: > > Hi > > But on the other hand the listview seems to be much faster then the > table (in every situation I had seen, especially in scrolling) > Also the usage of the table is identical to that of windows in every > way, which makes it a good choise for many situations. > > But you are right, the Table has much nore functions. But I think a > "lightweight" alternative (is that is the reality, I hadn't checked the > code sizes) is never a bad idea. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Table-vs.-ListView-tf4513949.html#a12877023 Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
