Hi Gaetan,

> Does anybody know if there is a better way than:
> var statics = qx.Class.getByName(this.classname)
>
> to access the static members/class variables of the "current" (most
> specialized) class from one of its parent class?
>   
I think this is the best way to do it.
> this.self(arguments) returns me those of the parent class.
>   
This method will return the class, the method was originally defined in. 
I still think this is a good default behavior. The method should 
reference always exactly the same static variable, no matter in which 
context the method gets called.
> Shouldn't something like this be the default behavior for
> this.self(arguments) (*)? This behavior is quite standard for class
> variables in OO languages.
>   
If you want this behavior you can always use member variables.  Why 
should it be possible to override static/class variables in sub classes? 
Then they would not be truely static.
> (*) In practice, and given Qooxdoo current way of doing things, you
> can't simply do that, I think. I think you'd have to add a method to
> get one "static attribute" back, which would do that and a recursive
> lookup in the parent class if the attribute is not found in the
> "specialized" class.
>   

Best Fabian

-- 
Fabian Jakobs
JavaScript Framework Developer

1&1 Internet AG
Brauerstraße 48
76135 Karlsruhe

Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484

Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Andreas Gauger, 
Thomas Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Achim Weiss
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to