On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Sebastian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> thron7 schrieb:
> >> If 0.8 removes the tree lines, it would be a complete show-stopper for
> >> me. Those lines are absolutely necessary whenever one has a fairly
> >> large, deeply-opened tree. Without them, it's near impossible to
> >> figure out the parent of a node if the parent is not visible without
> >> scrolling. I would be unable to use 0.8 until tree lines were
> re-added.
> >
> > I second on this one. Tree lines should at least be available as an
> option.
>
> Modern GUIs don't use tree lines anymore. I could perfectly life with a
> modified tree (maybe as a contribution) which includes support for tree
> lines. For a streamlined qooxdoo release I do not think that tree lines
> are necessary.
>
It's really sad that just because Microsoft needs to make their GUIs look
different so that they can sell new OS versions (even at the expense of a
valuable feature), others need to follow suit.
In any case, please make sure that whatever implementation the tree ends up
with does not prevent *easily* adding tree lines back in. As you've seen,
there have been three people commenting on this topic so far, all stating
that they believe that tree lines should be available.
Derrell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
