> First of all the testrunner is not limited to use just the GUI > application it is possible to implement completely independent > testrunners. We already have one very simple testrunner called > BasicRunner. You can try it by commenting in line 73 and comment > out line 71 in "testrunner.runner.Application" (You may have to > update your qooxdoo). It basically loads the application to test > (testrunner.TestLoader) in an IFrame and runs all tests, which > namespace matches the text field's value. > > It should be possible to embed the functionality of the TestLoader > into your application to test.
Thanks. The point is that we would like to bring all testing into the one place i.e. Selenium. It's already doing UI tests and can easily run the the unit tests as well, capturing output. > > OK. Would that work with aggressive optimisation of method names > > in a hypothetical future build version? > > > No, public members cannot be optimized/renamed. The testrunner > finds the tests by walking over all classes and searching classes, > which are instances of TestCase. All methods starting with "test" > are considered tests in those classes. OK, in which case it will always be OK. It would be trivial to *not* rename those if public renaming was ever implemented. Hugh ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
