Hugh,I hadn't much time to look at it, but I made spike solution for class Filtered.
Method applyFiltersQuickly behaves differently from qx method applyFilters. My class by default creates two instances of data - full _fullArr and filtered _rowArr. applyFiltersQuickly doesn't dispatch any events, only one event "dataChanged" is dispatched by setData inside applyFiltersQuickly.
That's all I need. Speed is perfect. asaris Hugh Gibson wrote:
Asaris, How did you get on? I still think it's worth raising a bug about this as the framework could be much improved. Hugh*Subject:* Re: [qooxdoo-devel] speed of method applyFilters in qx.ui.table.model.Filtered*From:* asaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *To:* qooxdoo Development <qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> *Date:* Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:04:22 +0100This is what I plan finalize tomorrow. To add alternative to applyFilters() method to Filtered class. In most cases (99.99..%) I wouldn't care about events for single row.Filter row data _fullArr to filtered row data filteredArr, set _filteredArr to model setData(filteredArr).I need to filter only tables in size max 20cols x 500rows. I made custom applyFilters yesterday on row data, has some bugs, but runs rocketfast.asaris Hugh Gibson wrote:when >> calling applyFilters(). I have no event listeners. My quickI have data sets of 20 columns and 50-150 rows. Model is used by Table. And 1 regex filter, that filters out 50%+ of rows. Unfortunately it's too slow. It takes 5-10+ seconds to filterNot surprising, looking at hideRows which shifts the whole data set alongbenchmark shows that hideRows() slows down process.and causes all sorts of events via Simple.removeRows.It should be possible to make this a lot faster by rewriting applyFilters to set up a filter of rows to be deleted first then doing them all atonce. A couple of simple optimisations would be to run through the rowsbackwards (so you're not moving rows around that are going to be deletedlater) and actually using the row count facility of hideRows. It's worth you raising an issue about this. Add a note that theapplyFilters method should really be calling a method to actual apply the filter to one row, making it easier to implement custom filters and alsomake it easier to actually delete the rows in different ways. Hugh------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
Filtered.js
Description: application/javascript
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
