petr kobalicek schrieb: > I'm looked at sources and now I understand this behavior, but I thing > that's not logic. I also looked at the latest trunk and it seems that > new getChildren() will be more useable for me :) > > 2008/7/1 petr kobalicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > To be correct. I'm getting that getItems() will return itself + > all children appended to it. > > 2008/7/1 petr kobalicek <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Hi again :-) > > Sorry if I'm posting too many posts about qooxdoo, but there > is too many things I want to know :) > > I'm today played with qx.ui.tree.Tree widget and some things > are for nonunderstandable. > > If I create instance of Tree, tree itself is a root node, this > is quite good and like it, but my question is, how > different is this: > > tree = new qx.ui.tree.Tree(); > if (!tree.getItems().length) {} > > and: > > tree = new qx.ui.tree.Tree(); > if (!tree.hasContent()) {} > > These two snipets will behave differently and it cost some > time for me to invent this:) > > If this was already discussed or this will be different in > 0.8, sorry:-) > This will be more sane on 0.8 :-)
Best fabian -- Fabian Jakobs JavaScript Framework Developer 1&1 Internet AG Brauerstraße 48 76135 Karlsruhe Amtsgericht Montabaur HRB 6484 Vorstand: Henning Ahlert, Ralph Dommermuth, Matthias Ehrlich, Thomas Gottschlich, Matthias Greve, Robert Hoffmann, Markus Huhn, Oliver Mauss, Achim Weiss Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Michael Scheeren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
