>> Yes, but the question I guess was: Is there a leak in 0.7?!

Ohhhh yes - at least as big as it was in 0.8 yesterday ... I only focused 
now on 0.8 because it was easier to debug/understand due to the new 
DOM-handling stuff.

I just quote from my first posting:
>> After 3000 Labels the IE7 memory is over 180MB (testet with 0.7.3 and 
0.8).

Since I'm a RAP user originally and don't know how fast the RAP guys 
officially will adapt 0.8 (which then hopefully won't have any leaks 
anymore :D ) I'm very interested that work and research is done on 0.7 as 
well.
I'm aware that 0.8. release is giving you a hard time right now, which is 
why I don't stress 0.7 too much currently.

If 0.8 doesn't leak memory than at least I have a good feeling for our RAP 
future - the rest is a matter of time, bothering you and RAP guys :-D, 
hoping and us adjusting release-plans of our own product (customers 
unfortunately with >90% IE). 
Maybe the worst problems will be already solved with the fix for the label 
(which was done in the legacy package Label as well as I saw it).

@Benjamin: currently I'm tracking quite exactly what is done on the 
widgets regarding memory consumptions. I'll definitely open a RAP bug 
report later on, listing all changes which might need to be applied to the 
qooxdoo version of RAP.
I just want to wait for the last leaking 40MB  ;-) ...




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to