Matthew Gregory wrote: > Out of curiosity, why do you want to replace the single click with a > drag and drop routine? > > If you did really want drag and drop, you couldn't do this on the movie > itself as Sabastian explained. You could consider creating "handles" for > each movie though depending on your UI. > > I'll try and explain what I mean in ASCII art (eek!) > > |-----------------|-----------------------------------| > | |-------------| | Title of current movie | > | |**| | |-----------------------------------| > | |**| Movie1 | | | > | |**| | | | > | |-------------| | BIG MOVIE HERE | > | | | > | |-------------| | | > | |**| | | | > | |**| Movie2 | | | > | |**| | | | > | |-------------| | | > |-----------------|-----------------------------------| > > You could then drag the "handles" by each movie (indicated by the **) > onto the "Title of current movie". >
Instead of handles what about covering the videos with an div layer that is invisible? I was even able to do this with an image map. This let me know where in the video I clicked. I don't know if the image map could be tied to drag and drop. The reason I say this is that the small videos may end up being one video that is made up of many areas which each represent a camera. This has been decided yet... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
