On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:46 AM, thron7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> > This brings up another interesting point.  That error in the API build
> has
> > apparently been there for a long time, but nobody noticed it (or at
> least,
> > didn't fix the class causing the problem, so I'm assuming they didn't
> notice
> > it).  I have had errors in my own build that I didn't notice too.  The
> > reason is that there's a LOT of superfluous information being presented,
> > that masks any real issues.  Is it possible to tell the generator to shut
> up
> > about all but important stuff?  I'd like for the generator not to say
> > anything at all on success, just like most compilers.  Warnings and
> errors
> > should then make themselves obvious.  (I'll look for your response here,
> but
> > I'll also post a ticket for this.)
> >
>
> Try passing the -q command line option to generate.py (haven't you tried
> that?!).


No, I wasn't aware of it, but I now see that it's right there in the help
output.  Thanks!

That option has one error, I think.  It still prints a bunch of unnecessary
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%  lines.  Could you get rid of
those?

I'd suggest that -q be the default so that people see their warnings and
errors without searching.  -v (verbose) then takes on the current meaning of
no options (fairly verbose), and -v -v (or maybe -V) would mean to be extra
verbose like the current -v option.

Also, what does "Excludes may break code!" mean?  That's displayed when
running "generate.py -q api" in the framework directory.

Derrell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to