Hello, I noticed Qooxdoo exclusively make use of element for widget construction.
I wonder if it is really appropriate for some types of widget (I think of tables and virtual trees). Is there a significant (dom) speed difference between html tables using vs virtual tables using ? Of course, virtual tables allow more flexibility. But thinking of really hudge tables (no remote and/or no pagination), is this rule still valuable ? Notice that I didn't "build" the Huge table example in the demo page but I've tested this example (the online version) in firefox 3.1 beta 2 and the vertical scroll was still slow. When I look at ExtJs, they manage tables and trees generation using and markup. I have no idea if it is much faster or not but do you think there is a difference in terms of "browser speed" ? Thank a lot, Benco. PS: My goal isn't to denigrate Qooxdoo, it's a great framework I plan to use again and again ;-). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/qx-widgets-and-markup-%28optimisation--%29-tp21173394p21173394.html Sent from the qooxdoo-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
